16CAUSES OF DOCTRINAL DEVELOPMENT.3. We must hold that wherever the Apostles preached, they instructed their converts sufficiently in the faith by their own teaching, and left an adequate deposit of Christian doctrine in the several churches they founded. Still, we can see from Paul's Epistles how much had remained to be supplemented, and how the implicit teaching that he had imparted on various points of doctrine needed to be afterwards explained and further developed. The Apostle is frequently led to dwell in his Epistles upon certain matters which the circumstances of those to whom he wrote made it more needful to explain. He solves their objections and difficulties, and answers the questions they have raised. But how many more inquiries might they not have proposed had their doctrinal investigation been more extended and their theological science more profound. And how many other things might he not have said by way of more fully explaining those revealed truths which he had taught them explicitly in his oral instructions. Now this is precisely what the Church has been continually doing by her definitions of faith, the teaching of her doctors and theologians, and through the ordinary Magisterium. We should hold that the Apostles had the fullest knowledge both extensively and intensively of Christian truth. No theologian to the end of time will ever know more than they did. To affirm that any in after time could have a more explicit faith than the Apostles, would, as Suarez teaches, be temerarious.*
|